Monday, 18 January 2016

Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)

Case Report

Patient’s Identity
Name
Mr. A
Age
38 years
Gender
Male

Autoanamnesis (5 August 2015)
Chief Complain
Since 2 days before admitted to Arifin Achmad’s Hospital, Patient complain weaked and numbed on his two legs after fell from roof

Present illness history
§ 2 days before admitted to Arifin Achmad Hospital, patient fell from roof with height approximately ± 5 m. Patient fell from the roof when repaired the tile with supine position which the back first get the trauma and lifted the head upward. After that, patient complain weaked (can’t moved and lifted his leg to stand up) and numbed on his two legs from waist to toe. Unconscious (-), Headache (-), nausea (-), gag (-). Patient immediately refered to Pematang Rebah Hospital and got a medical management. 30 minutes later, weaked and numbed only patients felt on his two legs from knee to toe until now.
§  At Pematang Rebah Hospital, patient still complained weaked and numbed on his two legs from knee to toe. Patient also complained pain if his leg was held and complained no sensation to urination and defecate. Patient also can’t urination dan defecate.  The first time he can urinate after 22 hours from that accident but still can’t defecate. Patient then referred to Arifin Achmad Hospital.

Past Illness history
§ History of brain trauma (-)
§ History numb of his leg and arm (-)
§ History of last fever (-)
§ History of stroke (-)
§ Diabetes Mellitus (-)
§ Hypertensi(-)
Family Illness history
(-)
RESUME ANAMNESIS
Mr.A, 38 years old admitted to hospital at 4 August 2015 referred from pematang rebah hospital with weaked and numbed on his two legs after fell from roof since 2 days. Patient fell from the roof when reparied the tile with supine position which the back first get the trauma with the head upward. Unconscious (-), Headache (-), nausea (-), gag (-). History last fever(-). Patient also complained pain in his leg if held and no sensation to urination and defecate. Patient also can’t urination dan defecate.

III. Physical Examination
A.    Generalized Condition
Blood Presure     :  130/90 mmHg                     
Heart Rate          :  68 bpm
Respiratory       :  Respiratory rate : 21 x/mnt  Type :  abdominotorakal
Temperature      :  36,9°C
Weight               : 60        Height : 162            IMT : 22,8 (Normal)

B.     Neurological status
Consciousness                     :  Composmentis  GCS   :  15 (E4 V5 M6)            
Noble Function                   :  Normal
Neck Rigidity                      :  Negatif
Cranial Nerve                       : Normal
Motoric                                : Paraparese with flaccid type
Sensory                        :   Hipestesia dermatom L4-S3 in right and left leg with
                                         Parestesia
 Position, Two point discrimination (Normal)
 Stereognosis, Graphestesia (Normal)
Coordination               :  Normal
Otonom                       :  Abnormality of defecate and urination
Reflex                                                                
            Fisiologis         :  Areflex of achilles reflex and patella reflex
            Patologic         :  No patologic reflex




V. WORKING DIAGNOSIS :
CLINIC DIAGNOSIS : Spinal Shock
-          Paraparese with flaccid type
-          Hipestesi dermatom L4-S3 in right and left leg with parestesia
-          Abnormality of defecate and urination
-          Areflex of Patella reflex and achilless reflex
TOPIC DIAGNOSIS                : L2 medulla spinalis anterior cord
ETIOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS     : Trauma Vetebrae
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS: Radicular injury

SUGGESTION EXAMINATION :
1.      Blood Routine
2.      Blood Chemistry
3.      Electrolit
4.      X-Ray Rontgen LumboSakral AP-Lateral
5.   MRI Thoraco Lumbal Vertebrae

MANAGEMENT :
§  IVFD RL20 dpm
§  Inj. Ketorolac 3 x 30 mg
§  Inj Ranitidin 2 x 50 mg
§  Inj Methylprednisolone 4 x 125 mg
§  Vit B Complex 1 x 1 tab (p.o)
§  Immobilisation
LABORATORIUM FINDING : Normal
 AP/L LumboSakral X- Ray




Compression Fracture Vetebrae L1
Osteofit Vetebrae L3-

 
MRI THORACO LUMBAL
 
 



Brusting fracture with bone edema corpus vetebrae L1
Kontusio Conus Medullaris
Spondylo-lisis Th12-L1

Final diagnose : Mielopaty lumbal ec Spinal Cord Injury




Discussion
Spinal Cord Injury
11.Anatomy of spine, spinal cord, demartomes and miotomes
a.      Spine

The spine (vertebral column) bears the weight of the head, neck, trunk and upper extremities. Its flexibility is greatest in the cervical region, intermediate in the lumbar region, and lowest in the thoracic region. Its uppermost vertebrae (atlas and axis) articulate with the head, and its lower most portion, the sacrum (which consists of 5 vertebrae fused together), articulates with the pelvis. There are 7 cervical, 12 thoracic, and 5 lumbar vertebrae, making a total of  24 above the sacrum. Below the sacrum, the coccyx is composed of 3 to 6 coccygeal vertebrae.1
 b.      Spinal cord
Like the brain, the spinal cord is intimately enveloped by the piamater, which contains numerous nerves and blood vessels; the piamater merges with the endoneurium of the spinal nerve rootlets and also continues below the spinal cord as the filum terminale internum. The weblike spinal arachnoid membrane contains only a few capillaries and no nerves. The denticulate ligament runs between the piamater and the duramater and anchors the spinal cord to the duramater. The spinal duramater originates at the edge of the foramen magnum and descends from it to form a tubular covering around the spinal cord. Its lumen ends at the S1–S2 level, where it continues as the filum terminale externum, which attaches to the sacrum, thus anchoring the dura mater inferiorly. The duramater forms sleeves around the anterior and posterior spinal nerve roots which continue distally, together with the arachnoid membrane, to form the epineurium and perineurium of the spinal nerves. The root filaments (rootlets) that come together to form the ventral and dorsal spinal nerve roots are arranged in longitudinal rows on the lateral surface of the spinal cord on both sides. The ventral root carries onlymotor fibers, while the dorsal root carries only sensory fibers. There are, therefore, just as many pairs of nerves in each of these regions as there are vertebrae (12 thoracic, 5 lumbar, 5 sacral and 1 coxcigeal).1,2
c.       Dermatomes and miotomes
A dermatome is defined as the cutaneous area whose sensory innervation is derived from a single spinal nerve (i.e., dorsal root). The division of the skin into dermatomes reflects thesegmental organization of the spinal cord and its associated nerves.1
Picture 1 Relation of Spinal nerve roots to vetebraes
  A myotome is defined as the muscular distribution of a single spinal nerve (i.e., ventral root), and is thus the muscular analogue of a cutaneous dermatome. Many muscles are innervated by multiple spinal nerves; only in the paravertebral musculature of the back (erector spinae muscle) is the myotomal pattern clearly segmental; the nerve supply here is through the dorsal branches of the spinal nerves.1




Picture 2 Dermatomes and myotomes of Spinal roots

 12.      Epidemiology
Acute spinal cord injury (SCI), whether traumatic or nontraumatic in etiology, has a tremendous cost not only for patients and families, but also for society as a whole. The incidence of SCI in the United States is estimated to be 30–40 cases per 1 million inhabitants. However, an exact incidence is difficult to ascertain because SCI is not reportable and there have not been large prospective and comprehensive studies done since the 1970s. There are 8000–10,000 new cases of acute SCI a year. It does appear, however, that despite the currently available acute and emergency care as well as the preventive measures the incidence of SCI and disorders and the resulting disabilities have remained stable. Approximately 183,000–230,000 people are living today with SCI. The average age of acute SCI is 31.8 yr and 80% of those affected are male.4

23.      Etiology
a.      Traumatic spinal cord injury
The most common causes of traumatic SCI include motor vehicle accident (MVA), motorcycle accidents (MCA), and falls. Other causes are work-related injuries, recreation, and sports activities such as diving injuries, and penetrating injuries secondary to knife or gunshot wounds. The most common location of SCI is the cervical spine (C5–C6 level) followed by the thoracolumbar junction, thoracic, and lumbar spine. Lap belt injuries are associated with thoracolumbar flexion distraction injury. Multiple level injuries occur in as high as 20% of the cases.4,5
b.      Nontraumatic spinal cord injury
Nontraumatic etiologies leading to an acute SCI include various bacterial, viral, fungal, or parasitic infections; tumors or other compressive lesions of the spinal cord; vascular events such as infarction; demyelinating lesions in spinal multiple sclerosis; toxins; autoimmune disorders; or nutritional deficiencies such as pernicious anemia (Table 1).4,5
Table 1. Etiologies Nontraumatic spinal cord injury4
Acute
Subacute–chronic
Chronic
Acute transverse myelitis
Spinal epidural abscess
Spinal epidural hematoma
Spinal cord infarction
Functional
Spinal cord tumor
Radiation myelopathy
Vascular malformation (AVM)
Infectious
Nutritional: vitamin B12 deficiency
Syringomyelia
Multiple sclerosis
Lumbar canal stenosis
Cervical spondylosis
Amyotrophic lateral Sclerosis

34.      Mechanisms of injury
It is generally accepted that acute SCI is a two step process that involves primary and secondary mechanisms. The primary mechanism results from the initial mechanical injury due to local deformation and energy transformation, whereas the secondary mechanisms encompass a cascade of biochemical and cellular processes that initiated by the primary process and cause ongoing cellular damage and death.6,7
            Primary SCI is most commonly a combination of the initial impact as well as subsequent persisting compression. The most frequent primary mechanism of SCI is impact of bone and ligament against the spinal cord from high translational forces, such as that generates by flexion, extension, axial rotation, or vetebral compression. The spinal cord may consequently be compressed, stretched, or crushed by fracture or dislocations, burst fractures of the vertebral body, or acutely ruptured intervertebral discs.
     A useful classification of spinal injuries is one that divides them into fracture-dislocations, pure fractures, and pure dislocations. The relative frequency of these types is about 3:1:1. All three types of spinal injury previously mentioned are produced by a similar mechanism, usually a vertical compression of the spinal column to which anteroflexion is added; or, the mechanism may be one of vertical compression and retroflexion (commonly referred to as hyperextension). The most important variables in the mechanics of vertebral injury are the structure of the bones at the level of the injury and the intensity, direction, and point of impact of the force.7
An understanding of the mechanism of injury and the radiographic findings can provide insight into the biomechanical stability of the vetebral column after SCI. For example, In the case of severe forward flexion injury, the head is bent sharply forward when the force is applied. The adjacent cervical vertebrae are forced together at the level of maximum stress. The anteroinferior edge of the upper vertebral body is driven into the one below, sometimes splitting it in two. The posterior part of the fractured body is displaced backward and compresses the cord. Concomitantly, there is tearing of the interspinous and posterior longitudinal ligaments. Less severe degrees of anteroflexion injury produce only dislocation. Vulnerability to the effects of anteroflexion (and to some extent to retroflexion injuries) is increased by the presence of cervical spondylosis or ankylosing spondylitis or by a congenital stenosis of the spinal canal.6,7
In hyperextension injuries, the mechanism is one of vertical compression with the head in an extended position. Stress is mainly on the posterior elements (the laminae and pedicles) of the midcervical vertebrae (C4 to C6), which may be fractured unilaterally or bilaterally—and on the anterior ligaments. This dual disruption in the spinal architecture allows for displacement of one vertebral body on the adjacent one. The dislocation results in the cord being caught between the laminae of the lower vertebra and the body of the one above.6,7
Secondary mechanisms that result from biochemical cascades that occur after the initial event are a source of ongoing SCI and neurologic deterioration. These cause damage to neural tissue onn the cellular level and include the pathologic effects of microvaskular changes, excitatory amino acids, cell membrane destabilization, free radicals, inflammatory mediators, and neroglia apoptosis.6
            Table 2. Spinal Fractures1
Fracture/Dislocation
Pathogenesis
Stability1
Cervical spine
Atlantoaxial dislocation
Jefferson’s fracture2
Dens fracture
Bilateral axis arch fracture4
Dislocation fracture of C3–7
Lateral compression fracture
Dislocation between C1 and C2
Axial trauma
Hyperflexion
Hyperflexion and distraction
Hyperflexion
Flexion and axial compression
Unstable
Unstable
Unstable3
Unstable
Unstable
Stable
Thoracic spine, lumbar spine
Compression fracture


Burst fracture
Dislocation fracture
Fall (back, buttocks, extended legs),direct trauma. These fractures may be pathological (osteoporosis, myeloma,
metastasis)
Stable


Stable
Unstable
1 At the time of injury. 2 Fracture of the ring of C1 due to compression between the occiput and C2. 3 May be
overlooked if the dens is not displaced; sometimes stable. 4 Hangman’s fracture.

45.      Clinical effects of spinal cord injury
When the spinal cord is suddenly and virtually or completely severed, three disorders of function are at once evident: (1) all voluntary movement in parts of the body below the lesion is immediately and permanently lost; (2) all sensation from the lower (aboral) parts is abolished; and (3) reflex functions in all segments of the isolated spinal cord are suspended. It is of variable duration (1 to 6 weeks as a rule but sometimes far longer) and is so dramatic that Riddoch used it as a basis for dividing the clinical effects of spinal cord transection into two stages, that of spinal shock and areflexia followed by the stage of heightened reflex activity.
a.      Stage of Spinal Shock or Areflexia
The loss of motor function at the time of injury—tetraplegia with lesions of the fourth to fifth cervical segments or above, paraplegia with lesions of the thoracic cord—is accompanied by immediate atonic paralysis of bladder and bowel, gastric atony, loss of sensation below a level corresponding to the spinal cord lesion, muscular flaccidity, and almost complete suppression of all spinal segmental reflex activity below the lesion. As a result of their sudden separation from higher levels, the neural elements below the lesion fail to perform their normal function. Also impaired in the segments below the lesion is the control of autonomic function. Vasomotor tone, sweating, and piloerection in the lower parts of the body are temporarily abolished. Systemic hypotension may be severe and contribute to the spinal cord damage.7
The sphincters of the bladder and the rectum remain contracted to some degree due to the loss of inhibitory influence of higher central nervous system (CNS) centers, but the detrusor of the bladder and smooth muscle of the rectum are atonic. Urine accumulates until the intravesicular pressure is sufficient to overcome the sphincters; then driblets escape (overflow incontinence). There is also passive distention of the bowel, retention of feces, and absence of peristalsis (paralytic ileus). Genital reflexes (penile erection, bulbocavernosus reflex, contraction of dartos muscle) are abolished or profoundly depressed.7

b.      Stage of Heightened Reflex Activity

This is the more familiar neurologic state that emerges within several weeks or months after spinal injury. Usually, after a few weeks, the reflex responses to stimulation, which are initially minimal and unsustained, become stronger and more easily elicitable and as time passes come to include additional and more proximal muscles.7
Various combinations of residual deficits (of lower and upper motor neurons and sensory neurons) are to be expected. Some of the resulting clinical pictures are complete or incomplete voluntary motor paralysis; a flaccid atrophic paralysis of upper limb muscles (if appropriate segments of gray matter are destroyed) with spastic weakness of the legs; a partial or rarely a complete Brown-Se´quard syndrome; and each of these occurs with variable sensory impairment in the legs and arms. High cervical lesions may result in extreme and prolonged tonic spasms of the legs due to release of tonic myotatic reflexes. Under these circumstances, attempted voluntary movement may excite intense contraction of all flexor and extensor muscles lasting for several minutes. Segmental damage in the low cervical or lumbar gray matter, destroying inhibitory Renshaw neurons, may release activity of remaining anterior horn cells, leading to spinal segmental spasticity. Any residual symptoms persisting after 6 months are likely to be permanent, although in a small proportion of patients some return of function (particularly sensation) is possible after this time. Loss of motor and sensory function above the lesion, coming on years after the trauma, occurs occasionally and is due to an enlarging cavity in the proximal segment of the cord.7

Table 3. The neurological deficits depend on the level of the lesion1
Level
Motor Deficit
Sensory Deficit
Autonomic Deficit
C1–C3
Quadriplegia, neck muscle paresis, spasticity, respiratory paralysis
Sensory level at back of head/edge of lower jaw; pain in back of head, neck, and shoulders
Voluntary control of bladder, bowel, and sexual function replaced by reflex control; Horner syndrome
C4–C5
Quadriplegia, diaphragmatic breathing
Sensory level at clavicle/shoulder
Same as above
C6–C8
Quadriplegia, spasticity, flaccid arm paresis, diaphragmatic breathing
Sensory level at upper chest wall/back; arms involved, shoulders spared
Same as above
T1–T5
Paraplegia, diminished respiratory volume
Sensory loss from inner surface of lower arm, upper chest wall, back region downward
Voluntary control of bladder, bowel, and sexual function replaced by reflex control
T5–T10
Paraplegia, spasticity
Sensory level on chest wall and back corresponding to level of spinal cord injury
Same as above
T11–L3
Flaccid paraplegia
Sensory loss from groin/ventral thigh downward, depending on level of injury
Same as above
L4–S2
Distal flaccid paraplegia
Sensory loss at shin/dorsum of foot/posterior thigh downward, depending on level of injury
Flaccid paralysis of bladder and bowel, loss of erectile function
S3–S5
Distal flaccid paraplegia
Sensory loss in perianal region and inner thigh
Flaccid paralysis of bladder and bowel, loss of erectile function


56.      Neurologic Assestment and classification
The level of the spinal cord and vertebral lesions can be determined from the clinical findings. Diaphragmatic paralysis occurs with lesions of the upper three cervical segments (an unrelated transient arrest of breathing is common in severe head injury). Complete paralysis of the arms and legs usually indicates a fracture or dislocation at the fourth to fifth cervical vertebrae. If the legs are paralyzed and the arms can still be abducted and flexed, the lesion is likely to be at the fifth to sixth cervical vertebrae. Paralysis of the legs and only the hands indicates a lesion at the sixth to seventh cervical level. The spinal cord ends at the first lumbar vertebra, usually at its rostral border. Vertebral lesions below this point give rise predominantly to cauda equina syndromes; these carry a better prognosis than injuries to the lower thoracic vertebrae, which involve both cord and multiple roots
The level of sensory loss on the trunk, determined by perception of pinprick, is an accurate guide to the level of the lesion, with a few qualifications. Lesions of the lower cervical cord, even if complete, may show a sparing of sensation down to the nipple line because of the contribution of the C3 and C4 cutaneous branches of the cervical plexus, which variably innervate skin below the clavicle. Or, a lesion that involves only the outermost fibers of the spinothalamic pathways, sparing the innermost ones, results in a sensory level (to pain and temperature) well below the level of the lesion. In all cases of spinal cord and cauda equina injury, the prognosis for recovery is more favorable if any movement or sensation is elicitable during the first 48 to 72 h.7
A neurologic examination with detailed recording of motor, sensory, and sphincter function is necessary to follow the clinical progress of spinal cord injury. Common practice is to define the injury according to the standards of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA).4-8
  
Table 4. ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) (modified from Frankel)
A = Complete
No sensory or motor function is preserved in the sacral segments S4-S5
B = Sensory incomplete
 Sensory but not motor function is preserved below the neurological level and includes the sacral segments S4-S5, AND no motor function is preserved more than three levels below the motor level on either side of the body.
C = Motor incomplete
Motor function is preserved below the neurological level**, and more than half of key muscle functions below the single neurological level of injury have a muscle grade less than 3 (Grades 0–2).
D = Motor incomplete
Motor function is preserved below the neurological level**, and at least half (half or more) of key muscle functions below the NLI have a muscle grade >3.
E = Normal
If sensation and motor function as tested with the ISNCSCI are graded as normal in all segments, and the patient had prior deficits, then the AIS grade is E. Someone without a SCI does not receive an AIS grade.
**For an individual to receive a grade of C or D, i.e. motor incomplete status, they must have either (1) voluntary anal sphincter contraction or (2) sacral sensory sparing (at S4/5 or DAP) with sparing of motor function more than three levels below the motor level for that side of the body. The Standards at this time allows even non-key muscle function more than 3 levels below the motor level to be used in determining motor incomplete status (AIS B versus C).

The following order if recommended in determining the classification of individuals with SCI.8
11. Determine sensory levels for right and left sides. 
22. Determine motor levels for right and left sides.
Note: in regions where there is no myotome to test, the motor level is presumed to be the same as the sensory level, if testable motor function above that level is also normal.
33.  Determine the single neurological level. this is the lowest segment where motor and sensory function is normal on both sides, and is the most cephalad of the sensory and motor levels determined in steps 1 and 2.
44.  Determine whether the injury is Complete or Incomplete (i.e. absence or presence of sacral sparing)
If voluntary anal contraction = No AND all S4-5 sensory scores = 0 AND deep anal pressure = No, then injury is COMPLETE. Otherwise, injury is Incomplete.
55.   Determine ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) Grade:

           While not a part of the International Standards examination or AIS classification, these incomplete syndromes have previously been described in this booklet, and as such have been maintained.8

a.      Central cord syndrome

Central cord syndrome is the most common of the clinical syndromes, often seen in individuals with underlying cervical spondylosis who sustain a hyperextension injury (most commonly from a fall); and may occur with or without fracture and dislocations. This clinically will present as an incomplete injury with greater weakness in the upper limbs than in the lower limbs.8


 Picture 4 Central cord syndrome5


b.      Brown-Sequard syndrome

Brown-Sequard syndrome (historically related to a knife wound) represents a spinal cord hemisection in its pure form, which results in ipsilateral loss of propioception and vibration and motor control at and below the level of lesion, sensory loss of all modalities at the level of the lesion, and contralateral loss of pain and temperature sensation. This specific syndrome in its pure form is rare, more often resulting in a clinical examination with some features of the Brown-Sequard and central cord syndrome. Some refer to this variation as Brown-Sequard-Plus Syndrome.8
Picture 5 Brown-Sequard Syndrome5

c.      Anterior cord syndrome

The anterior cord syndrome is a relatively rare syndrome that historically has been related to a decreased or absent blood supply to the anterior two-thirds of the spinal cord.  The dorsal columns are spared, but the corticospinal and spinothalamic tracts are compromised. The clinical symptoms include a loss of motor function, pain sensation and temperature sensation at and below the injury level with preservation of light touch and joint position sense.8

Picture 6 Anterior Cord Syndrome5

d.      Cauda equina syndrome

Cauda Equina syndrome involves the lumbosacral nerve roots of the cauda equina and may spare the spinal cord itself. Injury to the nerve roots, which are, by definition, lower motor neurons, will classically produce a flaccid paralysis of the muscles of the lower limbs (muscles affected depend upon the level of the injury), and areflexic bowel and bladder. All sensory modalities are similarly impaired, and there may be partial or complete loss of sensation. Sacral reflexes i.e. bulbocavernosus and anal wink will be absent.8 
 Picture 7 Cauda Equina Syndrome5

e.      Conus medullaris syndrome

Conus Medullaris Syndrome may clinically be similar to the Cauda Equina Syndrome, but the injury is more rostral in the cord (L1 and L2 area), relating to most commonly a thoraco-lumbar bony injury. Depending on the level of the lesion, this type of injury may manifest itself with a mixed picture of upper motor neuron (due to conus injury) and lower motor neuron symptoms (due to nerve root injury). In some cases, this may be very difficult to clinically distinguish from a cauda equina injury. Sacral segments may occasionally show preserved reflexes (i.e. bulbocavernosus and anal wink) with higher lesions of the conus medullaris.8 


 Picture 8 Conus Medullaris Syndrome5


17.      Imaging Studies

Radiologic examinations are undertaken to determine the alignment of vertebrae and pedicles, fracture of the pedicle or vertebral body, compression of the spinal cord or cauda equina due to malalignment, or bone debris in the spinal canal, and the presence of tissue damage within the cord. The MRI is ideally suited to display these processes but if it is not available myelography with CT scanning is an alternative. Instability of the spinal elements can often be inferred from dislocations or from certain fractures of thepedicles, pars articularis, or transverse processes, but gentle flexion and extension of the injured areas must sometimes be undertaken and plain films obtained in each position.7
28.      Management of spinal cord injury
a.      Acute medical management
Initial management of SCI patients consists of establishing airway, breathing, and circulation (ABCs). If endotracheal intubation is required, the nasotracheal approach with a fiberoptic bronchoscope is preferred to minimize damage with hyperextension of the neck. After trauma, any region of the spine suspicious for injury must be immobilized at the scene. A combination of rigid cervical collar and supportive blocks with backboard with straps is sufficient. Sandbags and tapes are not recommended. The immediate aim of treatment is to prevent the secondary damage to the spinal cord and nerve tissue. Anything that can hinder circulation or oxygenation to the cord can lead to further damage such as hypotension, hypoxia, hypoxia, hyperpyrexia, or compression from bony fragments. The possibility of hemodynamic instability, secondary to ongoing bleeding not identified before mobilization, or autonomic dysfunction should be noted. Intravenous fluids and pressors should be immediately available.4,5,6,7 
Once the patient enters the hospital, it is critical that an initial neurological assessment be made. The exam should be comprehensive enough to allow for proper identification of patients according to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) standard classification of SCI  and obtain the initial functional independence measure score (FIM score) (usually performed after the emergent evaluation and treatment). The former includes sensory examination with light touch and pin prick of 28 areas as well as strength testing of 10 upper and lower extremity muscles using a 0–5 score for complete loss to normal strength. After completing the examination using the ASIA criteria, the injury is determined to be either complete or incomplete. SCI is deemed complete when there is no motor or sensory function preserved below the level of injury or in the sacral segment (S4–5). The level of injury is the most caudal level intact on examination. The most important medical intervention that can be performed on the patient with an SCI is the prevention of further injury. This can be accomplished with vigilance and adherence to spinal protocols.4,5,6
High dose methylprednisolone is considered a neuroprotective agent in SCI and has been the standard of care for the past 15 years. Methylprednisolone is thought to improve spinal cord function by inhibiting lipid peroxidase and free radical production. Methylprednisolone was demonstrated to be an effective therapy for acute SCI in the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS) 2. The NASCIS 1 failed to demonstrate improvement after a single dose of methylprednisolone, but this dose was much lower. Patients in NASCIS 2 were treated with a bolus of 30 mg/kg body weight over 15 min and followed by infusion of 5.4 mg/ kg of body weight for 23 h. Only the patients started on treatment within 8 h of injury had improvement in both motor and sensory functioning. If therapy was begun more than 8 h after SCI, then therenwas no statistically significant improvement. The NASCIS 3 demonstrated improvement if the duration of methylprednisolone therapy was increased to 48 h for those patients started between 3 and 8 h after injury. The prior treatment regimen of 24 h should be continued in those patients started on therapy within 3 h. Despite these trials, the practice of giving high-dose steroids remains controversial as a result of increased morbidity and early mortality.4,5,6,7
Also, in a small series of patients, the administration of GM1 ganglioside (100 mg intravenously each day from the time of the accident) was found to enhance ultimate recovery to a modest degree but this finding has not been corroborated. GM1 ganglioside is a complex carbohydrate and is a normal constituent of the neuronal cell membrane. GM1 ganglioside has been implicated in cell growth, development, and repair. Two North American multicenter clinical trials have failed to demonstrate a convincing benefit inpatients with acute SCI. The data suggest that patients treated with GM1 ganglioside may improve faster than controls, but long-term outcome has not been significantly different from that of control groups. For those wishing to administer GM| ganglioside despite the lack of proven clinical efficacy, the accepted protocol is methylprednisolone per the NASCIS II protocol within 8 hours of injury, followed immediately by a loading dose of GM1 ganglioside 300 mg and a maintenance dosage of 100 mg per day for 56 days.4,5,7
Surgical Treatment
Surgical treatment is often necessary for decompression and stabilization of the spine. Immediate surgical intervention is warranted if the spine is unstable or evidence of cord compression exists with an incomplete injury. Otherwise, the timing of intervention remains controversial. The intent is to maintain an environment for optimal recovery of the cord. Early surgery can remove bony fragments or herniated disc material and stabilize the spine with severe ligamentous injury, which may cause impingement upon the cord despite immobilization. In theory, early surgery is done before worsening symptoms related to edema or hematoma occur. The argument for late surgery (more than 7 d after injury) is to allow time for medical management such as treatment of autonomic instability while at the same time letting swelling subside. Patients undergoing early intervention often worsen neurologically in the post-operative period related to swelling.4,5
The current available evidence suggests favorable outcome for surgeries that are performed within 25 h or after 200 h of the acute SCI . However, there are no studies of hyperacute SCI surgeries (i.e., within 6 h of symptom onset). Traction may be required to decompress the malaligned spine if early surgical intervention is not desired. Care must be taken to avoid further injury with too much traction. MRI of the spine before and after traction is recommended. In some cases the patient may heal without an operation and these patients should be stabilized in a hard collar or halo vest allowing for early mobilization and rehabilitation. Rarely is there any improvement after a complete SCI making surgery at any time controversial. Penetrating SCI from a knife, bullet, or other foreign object frequently does not require surgery. Infection and the development of cerebrospinal fluid fistulae would favor surgical exploration and possible debridement of the foreign body tract. Broad-spectrum antibiotics such as a third generation cephalosporin should be given for 2 wk after injury regardless of surgical intervention.4,5
b.        Chronic medical management
Chronic medical therapy is directed at preventing and treating the common, and often severe, medical complications of SCI. SCI produces a wide variety of changes in systemic physiology that can lead to a number of complications, which rival the impact of neurologic deficit on function and quality of life. Rehospitalization occured in 53% of patinents in first years after SCI and continued at a stable rate of about 37% per year over the next 20 years. Factor contributing to the risk of rehospitalization included increased agen and severity of SCI.6
Autonomic Dysreflexia
   Distension of the bladder or bowel in patients with SCI may lead to episodes ol autonomic dysreflexia, a potentially life-threatening situation. Seen in patients with SCI at the midthoracic level or above, the syndrome may also be triggered by other noxious stimuli, including decubiti, nephrolithiasis, genitourinary infection, surgical procedures under local anesthesia, and biliary disease. The syndrome presents as chills, diaphoresis, piloerection, hypertension, reflex bradycardia, pupillary dilatation, headache, and pallor. Death can result from cardiac arrest caused by profound vagal overactivity. Symptoms can occur even years after SCI. The Threshold for the development of symptoms appears to decrease with successive episodes. Treatment should be directed at eliminating the noxious stimulus (e.g., bladder or bowel decompression). Antihypertensive agents or vagolytics (e.g., atropine) may be necessary in severe cases.5
Coronary artery disease
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a prominent complication of SCI with long term survivors. Patients with SCI is mpre likelu to acquire CAD risk factors than the average population secondary to loss of muscle mass, inactivity, and increased body fat.6
Pulmonary disease
Respiratory function must be closely monitored, as respiratory embarrassment is the most common cause of morbidity and mortality in SCI patients. During the initial examination the respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and the vital capacity should be recorded in addition to obtaining a chest radiograph. Patients with C1-C3 injury are usually apneic after injury and require mechanical ventilation. In patients not requiring instant intubation, the vital capacity should be recorded several times daily. The most frequent respiratory complications include atelectasis, pneumonia, pulmonary edema, and respiratory failure. The treatment goal is to prevent these complications. Several methods including aggressive pulmonary toilet, intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV), intrapulmonary percussion, cough stimulation (with vibration using vest or vibrator, or cough stimulators), and postural drainage (via clapping, position changes, or special positioning beds) are used for prevention. Despite these measures, SCI patients often have reduced cough and increased secretions, which may require mechanical ventilation. Tracheostomy should be considered in patients during the first one to two weeks even if the patient is considered a candidate for weaning in the future.4
Genitourinary complications
Urological complications were significant causes of morbidity and mortality in the past, but this is declining with improving current genitourinary care. Initial workup after SCI should include a baseline blood urea nitrogen and creatinine, urine analysis, and urine culture. The patient may have an indwelling foley catheter after SCI. During this period of SS, the urinary bladder is atonic. This usually lasts 6– 8 wk as mentioned previously, but may extend up to 1 yr. When the patient is medically stable, intermittent catheterization should begin. Routinely this is done every 4 h, but should be done more frequently for increased fluid intake or when residual volumes are greater than 500 cc for two consecutive measurements.4,6
Frequent urological complications include urinary tract infection, pyelonephritis, renal nephrolithiasis, and renal failure. These patients frequently have chronic bacteruria, but should only be treated if symptoms of fever, flank pain, purulent urine, or hematuria develop. Periodic urine cultures should be obtained, so rapid treatment with the proper antibiotic can be initiated if the patient becomes symptomatic. The best preventative measure is good hydration. Other methods for prevention of infection such as chronic low dose antibiotic, intravesical instillation of antibiotic, or the acidification of urine with vitamin C have not proven to be beneficial, but still are used as standard of care in SCI patients. Once aggressive medical management fails, then alternate surgical options should be explored.4,6
Gastroinstestinal dysfunction
Bowel dysfunction is very common after SCI and can significantly affect quality of life. There are no evidence based recommendations for clinical management of this problem. A structured bowel regimen employing a regular diet, 2 – 3 L of fluid/day, 30 g of fiber, and chemical and mechanical stimulation is often employed to chieve predictable bowel evacuation to avoid fetal incontinence and impaction.4,6
Spasticity
The increased tone is beneficial for some activities such as sitting, standing, and even coughing, but proves to be a hindrance for mobility during rehabilitation, activities of daily living, and sleep. Initial treatment includes stretching of the limbs and physical therapy. The next step involves adding pharmacologic agents. The most common medications used are baclofen 10–200 mg daily in four divided doses, diazepam 4–60 mg daily in three divided doses, dantrolene 25–400 mg daily in three divided doses, clonidine 0.05 mg twice daily to 0.4 mg daily, or tizanidine 2–36 mg daily.4,6
 If the above medications fail, injections are attempted such as peripheral nerve blocks, botulinum toxin, or motor point blocks. Intrathecal baclofen can be delivered via an implanted pump. If these therapeutic modalites fail, then other surgical options are explored. The most common surgical procedure in SCI patients is dorsal root entry zone lesions (DREZ-otomy) during which the lateral small pain fibers are destroyed reducing the pain and spasticity.4,6
39.      Prognosis
The greatest risk to the patient with spinal cord injury is in the first 10 days when gastric dilatation, ileus, shock, and infection are threats to life. According to Messard and colleagues, the mortality rate falls rapidly after 3 months; beyond this time, 86 percent of paraplegics and 80 percent of quadriplegics will survive for 10 years or longer. In children, the survival rate is even higher according to DeVivo and colleagues, who found that the cumulative 7-year survival rate in spinal cord–injured children (who had survived at least 24 h after injury) was 87 percent. 7
Chronic pain (present in 30 to 50 percent of cases) requires the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication, injections of local anesthetics, and transcutaneous nerve stimulation. A combination of carbamazepine or gabapentin and either clonazepam or tricyclic antidepressants may be helpful in cases of burning leg and trunk pain. Recalcitrant pain may require more aggressive therapy, such as epidural injections of analgesics or corticosteroids or an implanted spinal cord stimulator that is applied to the dorsal columns, but often even these measures are ineffective. Spasticity and flexor spasms may be troublesome; oral baclofen, diazepam, or tizanidine may provide some relief. In permanent spastic paraplegia with severe stiffness and adductor and flexor spasms of the legs, intrathecal baclofen, delivered by an automated pump in doses of 12 to 400 mg/day, has also been helpful. The drug is believed to act at the synapses of spinal reflexes (Penn and Kroin). One must always be alert to the threat of pulmonary embolism from deepvein thrombi, although the incidence is surprisingly low after the first several months. Physical therapy, muscle re-education, and the proper use of braces are all important in the rehabilitation of the patient. All this is best carried out in special centers for rehabilitation of spinal cord injuries.4,6,7

Basic of Diagnosis
Clinic diagnosis : Spinal Shock
From Anamnesis and Physical Examination we get :
-          Paraparese with flaccid type (miotome L2 – S1)
-          Hipestesi dermatom L4-S3 in right and left leg with parestesia
-          Abnormality of defecate and urination
-          Areflex of Patella reflex and achilless reflex
          Spinal Shock is the loss of motor function at the time of injury—tetraplegia with lesions of the fourth to fifth cervical segments or above, paraplegia with lesions of the thoracic cord—is accompanied by immediate atonic paralysis of bladder and bowel, gastric atony, loss of sensation below a level corresponding to the spinal cord lesion, muscular flaccidity, and almost complete suppression of all spinal segmental reflex activity below the lesion. As a result of their sudden separation from higher levels, the neural elements below the lesion fail to perform their normal function. Also impaired in the segments below the lesion is the control of autonomic function. Urine accumulates until the intravesicular pressure is sufficient to overcome the sphincters; then driblets escape (overflow incontinence). There is also passive distention of the bowel, retention of feces, and absence of peristalsis (paralytic ileus). Genital reflexes (penile erection, bulbocavernosus reflex, contraction of dartos muscle) are abolished or profoundly depressed.7
Topic Diagnosis : anterior cord of L2 medulla spinalis
When the spinal cord is suddenly and virtually or completely severed, three disorders of function are at once evident: (1) all voluntary movement in parts of the body below the lesion is immediately and permanently lost; (2) all sensation from the lower (aboral) parts is abolished; and (3) reflex functions in all segments of the isolated spinal cord are suspended.7
We can conclude TD from clinical manifestations and physical exam:
-          Paraparese with flaccid type (L2 – S1)
-          Hipestesi dermatom L4-S3 in right and left leg with parestesia
-          Abnormality of defecate and urination
-          Areflex of Patella reflex and achilless reflex
In the anterior cord syndrome, The dorsal columns are spared, but the corticospinal and spinothalamic tracts are compromised. The clinical symptoms include a loss of motor function, pain sensation and temperature sensation at and below the injury level with preservation of light touch and joint position sense.8

 ETIOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS     : Trauma Vetebrae
        From the anamnesis, we get that that patient had history of trauma,  patient fell from roof with height approximately ± 5 m. Patient fell from the roof when repaired the tile with supine position which the back first get the trauma and lifted the head upward.
        From anamnesis and physical examination, we considered the lesion in anterior cord of medulla spinalis (L2) so the radiological sentration it would be higher on vertebrae segment. The vertebrae segment can caused that lesion it must be on vertebra thoracal 11/12. So the radiological sentration we suggest must on Ro. Thoraco-Lumbal (ap-lateral).

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS: Radicular injury
The complete spinal cord transection syndrome is most commonly caused by trauma, less commonly by inflammation or infection (transverse myelitis). Acute spinal cord trauma initially produces so-called spinal shock, a clinical picture whose pathophysiology is incompletely understood. Below the level of the lesion there is complete, flaccid paralysis, and all modalities of sensation are lost. Bladder, bowel, and sexual function are lost as well. Only the bulbocavernosus reflex is preserved—an important point for the diagnostic differentiation of this condition from polyradiculitis, in which it is typically absent.1

 

References

11. Rokhamm R. Colour atlas of neurology. Thieme. Stuttgart, Germany. 2004. h 30-33; 272-275; 380-381
22.  Baethr M, Frotscher M. Duus: Topical diagnosis in neurology: Anatomy · Physiology · Signs · Symptoms. 4th completely revised edition. New York. Thieme. h 23-30.
33.  Selections from the Netter Collection of Medical Illustrations. Atlas of neuroanatomy and  neurophysiology. Special Edition. USA. Icon Custom Communications. 2002. h 22
44. Derwenskus J, Zaidat O.O. Spinal Cord Injury and Related Diseases. Dalam Suarez J.L, editors. Critical care of neurology and neurosurgery. Totowa, New Jersey. Humana Press. 2004. h 417-432.
55. Santiago P, Fessler R.G. Spinal Cord Trauma. Dalam Bradley R.G et al, editor. Neurology in clinical practice: principle of diagnosis and management. Fourth edition. Philadelphia. USA. An imprint Elsevier.h 1150-1175.
66. Mandigo C.E, Kaiser M.G, Angevine P.D. Spine Injury. Dalam: Rolowand L.P, Pedley T,A, editor. Merrit’s Neurology Twelfth edition. Philadelphia. USA. LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WOLTERS KLUWER business. 2010. h 495-502.
77. Ropper A.H, Brown R.H. Adams and victor’s principles of neurology. Eight Edition. New York. McGraw-Hill Companies MEDICAL PUBLISHING DIVISION. 2005. h 1049-1055.
88.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (Revised 2011)







No comments:

Post a Comment

terima kasih sudah membaca blog saya, silakan tinggalkan komentar